Skip to content

FTC Publishing.com Settlement Highlights Risks of Earnings Claims

Picture of Nicholas Lipresti, Esq.

 

  • FTC settlement targets misleading passive income and earnings claims
  • Testimonials and endorsements can create compliance risk even when technically true
  • Refund terms and material relationships should be clearly disclosed

There’s a new version of the “get rich quick scheme” fueled by an ever-expanding internet with easier access to broad audiences. From e-commerce and artificial intelligence to online coaching, cryptocurrency, and self-publishing, entrepreneurs increasingly market programs that claim to help consumers build new revenue streams with relatively little upfront experience.

But, along with the promise of fast cash comes significant legal risk when the marketing gets ahead of what the evidence can support. In recent years, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has devoted significant enforcement resources to reviewing marketing practices involving earnings claims, endorsements, refund policies, and consumer testimonials.

One recent example is the FTC’s settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals. Although the settlement does not constitute an admission of wrongdoing, it offers a useful look into how regulators assess marketing and advertising practices. In particular, the matter highlights several practical compliance considerations for businesses that promote educational programs, coaching services, and other income-generating opportunities.

The FTC Alleges that Publishing.com Overstated Likely Earnings

According to the FTC, Publishing.com marketed educational programs designed to teach consumers how to generate income by publishing e-books and audiobooks online.

The Commission alleged that Publishing.com represented that consumers could earn substantial income using its proprietary system and highlighted the founders’ own financial success as evidence of the program’s effectiveness. According to the FTC, those representations did not accurately reflect the typical experience of consumers and that many purchasers did not achieve comparable financial results.

In addition to its allegations regarding earnings representations, the FTC asserted that the company:

    • Made earnings claims without adequate substantiation;
    • Imposed refund conditions that consumers allegedly could not reasonably discover because significant limitations appeared primarily in lengthy terms and conditions;
    • Used endorsements and testimonials without adequately disclosing material relationships; and
    • Offered incentives for favorable reviews without providing appropriate disclosures.

The matter ultimately concluded through a negotiated settlement. As is customary in many regulatory settlements, the agreement resolved the FTC’s allegations without any admission of liability by the defendants.

The Case Highlights Four Key Marketing Compliance Risks

Although the facts are specific to Publishing.com, the legal principles involved apply broadly to companies that market products or services directly to consumers.

Earnings Claims Need Reliable Support

Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce. One longstanding principle under that framework is that businesses should possess a reasonable basis for express or implied earnings claims before those claims are presented to consumers.

For example, if advertising suggests that customers are likely to achieve substantial financial success, businesses should have reliable evidence supporting that representation. A small number of exceptional success stories generally will not, by themselves, establish what a typical consumer can reasonably expect.

This principle has become particularly important as online education platforms, digital business opportunities, and coaching programs continue to expand.

Testimonials Should Reflect Consumer Expectations

Customer testimonials remain an effective marketing tool, but regulators continue to emphasize that testimonials should not create a misleading impression regarding likely consumer outcomes.

Even when a success story is genuine, businesses should carefully consider whether consumers are likely to view the featured results as typical. If the advertised outcome reflects an extraordinary outcome rather than the ordinary experience, clear disclosures and appropriate context may be necessary to reduce the risk of creating misleading expectations.

Material Relationships Should Be Clearly Disclosed

The FTC also focused on whether consumers were adequately informed about relationships between endorsers and the company.

Federal endorsement guidance generally requires businesses to disclose material connections that could influence the credibility consumers assign to a review or testimonial. These relationships may include:

    • Employment relationships;
    • Ownership interests;
    • Family relationships;
    • Financial compensation;
    • Complimentary products or services; or
    • Other incentives provided in exchange for endorsements.

Clear disclosure allows consumers to evaluate endorsements with appropriate context.

Refund Restrictions Should Be Transparent

The complaint also addressed the company’s refund process, alleging that important eligibility requirements were not presented prominently before purchase.

From a compliance perspective, businesses should ensure that material limitations, conditions, or exclusions relating to refunds and cancellation rights are disclosed clearly and conspicuously, rather than relying solely on lengthy contractual terms or fine print.

Publishing.com Agrees to $1.5 Million Payment and Ongoing Compliance Restrictions

Under the final order, Publishing.com and its principals agreed to pay $1.5 million.

The settlement also imposes ongoing compliance obligations, including restrictions on:

    • Making misleading or unsubstantiated earnings claims;
    • Misrepresenting material facts in the sale of products or services;
    • Misrepresenting endorsements or consumer reviews;
    • Failing to adequately disclose refund or cancellation policies; and
    • Failing to disclose material relationships with endorsers or reviewers.

These requirements reflect compliance expectations that extend well beyond this individual matter and are consistent with broader FTC enforcement priorities.

Why This Matters for Businesses

The Publishing.com settlement is one example of a broader regulatory focus on consumer marketing practices.

In recent years, the FTC has brought enforcement actions involving businesses offering:

    • Online business opportunities;
    • Coaching and mentorship programs;
    • Investment education;
    • Artificial intelligence training;
    • E-commerce systems;
    • Real estate investment education; and
    • Other programs promoting financial independence or passive income.

Importantly, these enforcement actions do not suggest that these industries are inherently problematic. Rather, regulators are focused on ensuring that marketing accurately represents what consumers can reasonably expect and that businesses provide sufficient information for consumers to make informed purchasing decisions.

For businesses operating in these markets, marketing materials deserve the same careful review as contracts and other legal documents.

What Businesses Should Do Now

The Publishing.com settlement offers several practical reminders for businesses that advertise products or services to consumers:

    • Support earnings claims with reliable evidence. Claims regarding potential income should be supported before they are published.
    • Use testimonials carefully. Marketing should avoid creating unrealistic expectations based on exceptional outcomes.
    • Disclose material relationships. Consumers should understand when reviewers or endorsers have financial or other relationships with the business.
    • Present refund policies clearly. Important limitations should be disclosed prominently and in plain language.
    • Review marketing materials regularly. Websites, webinars, social media, email campaigns, affiliate marketing, and advertising should be periodically evaluated to ensure continued compliance with evolving FTC guidance.

Make Compliance Part of Your Marketing Strategy

The Publishing.com settlement illustrates the continued importance of transparency, substantiation, and accuracy in consumer marketing. As regulators devote increasing attention to digital advertising, online educational programs, and influencer marketing, companies should ensure that their marketing materials accurately describe the products and opportunities they offer.

Whether you are promoting an online course, consulting service, software platform, or business opportunity, view compliance as an integral part of your marketing strategy rather than an afterthought. Conduct a careful legal review of earnings claims, testimonials, endorsements, and refund practices to reduce regulatory risk and reinforce consumer confidence and long-term business credibility.

Nicholas Lipresti is a business attorney who advises companies on corporate, transactional and regulatory matters. As outside general counsel to businesses from startups to established companies, he helps clients navigate legal risk, evaluate business decisions and address compliance issues as they grow. 

 
,